Short Sale Blog

Obama’s Loan Modification Program Slowing Down

Ross Kilburn - Tuesday, August 24, 2010
July 2010 saw more cancellations of government-sponsored loan modifications than new loan modifications.

HAMP, the Housing Affordable Modifications Program, was initiated by President Obama in April 2009 to help homeowners who are struggling to meet their mortgage payments. The program can provide assistance for mortgage holders who want to refinance their mortgage or negotiate a loan modification with their lenders. It also includes opportunities for those who wish to mitigate their losses through short sales.

HAMP helps homeowners looking to modify their loan by giving lenders incentives to negotiate more favorable terms: for example by increasing the time period of the loan and by lowering interest rates. Homeowners start with at least three payments on “trial” before the loan modification becomes permanent.

However, nearly half of the 1.3 million loan modifications that have been negotiated under the HAMP program have been cancelled. This July, the number of new government-sponsored loan modifications grew by its slowest rate since the program started, and there were five times more cancellations than new modifications.

The Treasury indicated last week that there will be more cancellations than new trials for the coming months. This is to clear a backlog of “aged trials” from the program’s early days, when banks were encouraged to approve new trial loan modifications without supporting documents to ensure borrowers’ eligibility.

A total of 422,000 borrowers have received permanent loan modifications through HAMP. Other alternatives HAMP offers to homeowners include negotiating a short sale or a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure.

Seattle Short Sales, Inc. is a specialist in the marketing and short selling of properties in the Seattle area. Please contact us with any of your questions about short sales.

What Homeowners Need to Know About Loan Modifications

Ross Kilburn - Thursday, November 05, 2009
In my experience, working with hundreds of Seattle area pre-foreclosure homeowners since 2004, the homeowner is best served when they find closure as soon as possible.

Loan modifications, for the vast majority of homeowners, only postpones the inevitable.

Consider this reality: Out of 3.1 million delinquent mortgages in September of 2009, only 16% have been successfully modified. The average homeowner has roughly a one in six chance of getting their bank to agree to a loan modification.

To even get to that point, the homeowner usually has to suffer through months of agony, as they fax and re-fax the same documents to the lender, are given conflicting information, and struggle to come up with the funds necessary for entering trial forbearance programs.

But what happens to a homeowner who successfully achieves a loan modification? The majority of homeowners (56%) re-default within 12 months. After just three months, 28% are already in default.

That takes the odds of success down to one homeowner in twelve. But even that sole survivor is not in great shape.

Only 10% of the loan modifications involve a principal reduction. The loan modification is usually achieved by lengthening the term of the loan, or making the loan into an interest-only loan, with the principal payback postponed until the future sale of the house. What this means is that the borrower continues on the hook for a property that is underwater, for an additional ten years, without paying down the principal for the entire time. That is not the recipe for success. It is that kind of creative lending that caused the bust in the first place.

Here are the specific track records for a few select lenders:

Bank of America: 11 percent of eligible loans have been modified under the Making Home Affordable program.

JPMorgan Chase: It has offered modifications to 27 percent of eligible borrowers through the federal program.

Wells Fargo/Wachovia: They have modified 17 percent of eligible loans.

All of the above numbers come from the September 2009 report of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, or OCC, which regulates national banks. The OCC is a division of the U.S. Treasury, the entity that oversees the Making Home Affordable program.

The bottom line is that if a homeowner wants complete, guaranteed finality to their situation, there is usually just one answer. Find a new housing payment that they can afford and lock it in. For many homeowners, that means ditching their $2,500/mo mortgage payments and renting a $900/mo studio apartment. I understand, that might sound horrific to homeowners who have never missed a payment in their lives and feel like they are just going through a rough patch.

However, in my experience homeowners will choose to drain their retirement accounts in an attempt to save their house, yet in the end, completely run out of money and be forced to move anyway. In contrast, I have seen great results from homeowners who make a clean break from a bad situation and as a result, preserve their precious resources.

Another significant result of taking charge of the situation, is the added benefit of freeing up mental space to pursue new income opportunities. By not spending all the waking moments focused on the past, amazing amounts of creative energies are released.

Perhaps someday, the Making Home Affordable loan modification program will work for the vast majority of homeowners. In the meantime, carefully analyze the existing program, and make sure it works for your situation, before committing precious time and money to getting a loan modification.

Click here to learn more about the Seattle Short Sale Advantage program, and how it has helped hundreds of other local homeowners.

Loan Servicers Unable to Keep Up With Loan Modification Requests

Ross Kilburn - Monday, June 29, 2009
Here is a good article from the New York Times covering some of the problems of the loan modification process. There are some great quotes from the actual servicers, making up stories for lost files. It is funny, but tragic. Due to the media and the government, many homeowners honestly believe that there housing problem might be turned around with a loan modification.

In reality, if a homeowner has received a Notice of Trustee Sale in Washington state, there is only a very slim chance that they will be able to pull off a loan modification. What often happens is that the homeowner is strung along for months, before finally being rejected at the last second, days before the auction. At this point they have pretty much run out of all options.

We have found that it is best that the homeowner deal with their situation pro-actively and sell the home. By taking matters into their own hands, they are guaranteed to lower their housing costs by becoming a renter. For most borrowers, hoping for a loan modification only delays the inevitable.

Here is the article: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/29/business/29loanmod.html?_r=1&emc=eta1

Loan Modifications Still Not Working

Ross Kilburn - Wednesday, May 27, 2009
Loan modifications have been promoted as the 'answer' to our nation's housing crisis. The idea was that by either reducing the principal balance of the loan, or lowering the interest rate on the loan, troubled borrowers would be able to keep their home.

The first statistics that came from the FDIC were not promising. 65% of borrowers who had their loan modified via the government run IndyMac bank were in default within 6 months. Since then, the government has encouraged even more loan modifications, with the argument that the loan servicers need to lower the monthly payment for the borrowers even further to make the policy work.

Well, Fitch Ratings has come out with a report looking at a bundle of securities from 2005 to 2007 that are managed by around 30 mortgage companies. Fitch found that a conservative project was that between 65% and 75% of modified subprime loans with go into default within the first year after the modification. Even loans where the principal was reduced by 20% were still redefaulting at rates of 30-40% in the first year.

If you are a homeowner, and are not able to make your payments, the best thing to do is take matters into your own hands and get your property sold and your accounts settled with your lender. All too often, the hope for a loan modification makes homeowners wait until it is too late to sell the house and then they lose it to the auction.

Credit Unions Rejecting Cramdown Proposals

Ross Kilburn - Thursday, April 23, 2009
A mortgage-relief plan being developed by Senate Democrats and the banking industry hit a snag. The National Association of Federal Credit Unions set it did not agree with the plan to allow homeowners to modify their mortgages through bankruptcy proceedings. That process is called a 'cramdown.'

The measure had already passed the House, but is fiercely being opposed by banks and credit unions who fear a flood of bankruptcy filings, and ultimately drive up mortgage rates.

To ease the pain for the credit unions, the Senate is willing to allow credit unions greater freedom to make loans to businesses.

Politics go on and on and on...

Principal Write-Downs Becoming More Common

Ross Kilburn - Wednesday, February 04, 2009
As we have discussed previously, most loan modifications end up in the borrower defaulting again. A few banks are trying out a new policy to try to change that. Litton Loan Servicing, owned by Goldman Sachs, is now doing principal write-downs on more loan modifications.

Since November 2008, the percent of their loan modifications that include a principal write-down increased from 33% from 19%. Litton made this change after analyzing loan modification they did in early 2008 where they found that borrowers were 50% less likely to default if the modification included a principal write-down.

Unfortunately, according to the latest statistics from a study done by Valparaiso University Law School found that forthy-seven percent of loan modifications completed in November resulted in higher payments for borrowers, and an additional 20% left mortgage payments the same.

For Litton, with their new program, monthly payments were reduced by an average of $391 or 26.6%. To establish the lower payment Litton first cuts the interest rate, then extends the loan term to 30 years, then waives late fees and other arrearages. If all of that doesn't create a payment that is 31% of the borrower's monthly income, they will then lower the principal amount.

Beware of Loan Modification Companies

Ross Kilburn - Thursday, January 15, 2009
It is very disappointing to see many former mortgage brokers and real estate agents suddenly become Loan Modification specialists. Many companies charge up to $3,000 to help homeowners modify their loan so that they can stop their foreclosure and stay in their house. The reality is that the homeowners are usually getting ripped off. It doesn't cost $3,000 to talk to the bank on behalf of a homeowner. In addition to sucking the remaining few dollars out of a struggling homeowner, the bigger issue is that rarely do loan modifications truly help the homeowner in the long run. 

Lenders will often ask for a 'contribution' or a 'repayment of arrears' prior to accepting the loan modification application. Then, if the homeowner doesn't qualify for a loan modification, the home continues down the foreclosure path before it is sold at auction. The money the homeowner sent in is lost. That is adding insult to injury at the very moment the homeowner should be preserving their funds.

Then, even if the homeowner qualifies for the loan modification, the government statistics are very clear, showing that the majority of homeowners default on their new loan terms within six months. It is very clear that if a homeowner is facing foreclosure, the best thing to do is get their accounts settled with their mortgage company by selling their house, doing a short sale if necessary, and moving on. Getting a fresh housing start allows the homeowner to drastically reduce their monthly housing payments, and allows them to focus on getting, or keeping stable employment.

Here is a recent article from the New York Times on the loan modification scams that are rampant:

Short Sale vs a Possible Loan Workout

Ross Kilburn - Wednesday, January 14, 2009
I met with a homeowner last week. His name is Daniel. He is a general contractor and his business has come to a grinding halt over the last six months. He may have a couple possible jobs coming up, but they are doubtful he tells me. He is living in a split-level in Kirkland with his special needs son. He owes over $450,000 on the house, and he knows he can't sell it for that today. He just ran out of money, and won't be able to make his next mortgage payment. 

He told me that his desire is to save his credit. Also, he told me he doesn't like the house and is ready to let it go. We went over the process of doing a short sale. It made sense to him and he wanted to move forward. His main concern was the cost and hassle of moving all of his stuff and keeping his child in the same school district. Those are valid concerns. 

His plan was to be moved out within 45 days. Instead of being faced with a monthly mortgage of $3,000 per month that he couldn't pay, he would find an apartment for $1,000. With the reduced housing cost, he would be able to take on lesser paying contract work, and be able to pay his bills. By biting the bullet, and moving, he would be able to put his housing problems behind him and focus on income generation and being a good provider for his family.

We were all ready to move forward when he spoke with his CPA yesterday. The CPA told him he should try to save the house. He told Daniel to call the lender and see if he can work something out. He told Daniel that the new administration might have programs to help him stay.

After that conversation with the CPA, Daniel doesn't know what to do. So, he is going to wait and see.

Unfortunately, that is an action that doesn't typically lead to good results for homeowners. Currently, over 57% of homeowners who do a loan modification default again within 6 months. The only guaranteed way to get your financial house in order is to downsize and reduce your monthly housing expenses. This isn't a time to risk waiting for new programs to be unveiled. It is time to take responsibility for your own affairs and get them in order.

I believe the CPA is over-stretching the limits of his expertise and fiduciary duty when he counsels a homeowner to take a wait and see approach in a foreclosure situation when the homeowner is facing a ticking clock towards the auction date of their house.

Hoping for a mortgage bailout, whether it is a principal write-down or a lower fixed rate will still leave Daniel in a house that he doesn’t want to be in, with a payment that is still too high. Stretching things out over the next 5 months before his auction date will just keep him paralyzed from focusing on getting more work.

His job isn’t to save a house he doesn’t want. It is to get affordable housing for himself and his son quickly, and focus on landing new jobs.

Loan Modifications Not Working - Cram Downs Expected

Ross Kilburn - Monday, January 05, 2009
Government loan modification programs aren't working. The next thing to try is cram-downs. That is when a mortgage lender is forced to lower the principal amount of the loan on properties that are underwater. It is expected that the new administration will allow bankruptcy judges to force cram downs on lenders on behalf of bankrupt borrowers.

Modified Loans Not Helping Homeowners

Ross Kilburn - Monday, December 08, 2008

From today’s Wall Street Journal:

Many troubled homeowners are quickly falling behind again on their mortgage payments after their loan is modified, new data from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency show.

The OCC data reflects actions taken by the 14 largest national banks and thrifts, which together represent 60% of the mortgage industry. Nearly 36% of borrowers were more than 30 days past due on the loan payment three months after their loan was modified and nearly 53% were more than 30 days late after six months, according to the OCC. 

“The results, I confess, were somewhat surprising, and not in a good way,” Comptroller of the Currency John C. Dugan said in a speech in Washington, D.C. on Monday. Mr. Dugan said it wasn’t clear whether the low success rate reflected the fact that the modifications weren’t reducing monthly loan payments enough to be truly affordable, whether the mortgages were so badly underwritten that they weren’t affordable, even with lower payments, or if both factors were at work.

The high redefault rate raises questions about the effectiveness of current efforts to work with troubled borrowers and comes at time when the federal government is facing increased pressure to do more to reduce foreclosures.  

“Despite good-faith efforts by both the private and public sectors, the foreclosure rate remains too high, with adverse consequences for both those directly involved and for the broader economy,” Federal Reserve Board Chairman Ben Bernake said in a speech last week.